Skip to main content

No, Chromium browsers aren't going anywhere any time soon

Google is simply doing what it does best — keeping its extras to itself.

I've seen something being shared around that looks like terrible news for anyone who loves the way Chrome can render a web page but hates the extra bloat that's baked into Google's browser. According to It's FOSS — a web site dedicated to all things open-source and a site I read regularly — third-party browsers that use Chromium are being locked out of certain features because Google is worried about market share.

That would be a devastating loss to you, me, and the internet as a whole if it were the case, but I don't think it has anything to do with the market share of Chrome or that Google really cares about the particular features in play here. It's just Google making sure that only you and it have access to sensitive information stored in your Google account.

What is going on here?

Starting on March 15, 2021, developers writing Chromium-based browsers like Brave or Microsoft Edge can no longer have open access to a small set of features: Chrome sync and Click to Call. These are two very nice features, especially if you use multiple devices with the same Google account.

I love using Chrome sync but hate the idea that my data is just sitting there in the cloud.

Chrome sync is the utility that lets you store things like bookmarks or passwords in the cloud and retrieve them as long as you're signed in to Google using the same account on any number of devices. I use it a lot and hate to think about not being able to keep using it. Click to Call is exactly what it sounds like — when the browser sees something it recognizes as a phone number, you can tap it and call that number automagically through your Android phone.

That's it. Everything else in Chromium, the open-source code that Google uses to build Chrome and companies like Microsoft use to build Edge, is still open and free. Free not only as in it costs nothing, but also free as in anyone can modify it and use it the way they like. That's why so many other companies make Chromium-based browsers. The web works really well using it and it's there for the taking.

This is happening, even Google admits that it is "limiting private API availability in Chromium" and that these features should have never been available to any company not named Google.

The part I don't agree with is that Google is doing it because it fears Opera or Brave will take away its browser market share.

Private APIs

You're probably familiar with what a private API is even if you never heard the term before — your phone uses a lot of them.

Samsung has its own APIs. So does OnePlus, or Motorola, or any other Android-powered phone. Well, Google has them, too. Most of Google's "private" APIs aren't limited to only Pixel phones because of things like the Google Services Framework, but Pixel phones also have features that no other phones can use, like the camera algorithms or the Pixel Recorder app.

Chrome doesn't have something akin to the Google Services Framework. Sure, the best Chromebooks can use Google Play Services for running Android apps, but there is no ready-made set of "private" APIs built for the browser to use. If there were, this would have never happened because it would give Google the one thing it wants to have: control.

Google pillages a lot of personal information whenever we use its products, though it is working on ways to pare that back pretty drastically. But Google also realizes that if it is going to have so much information, it really needs to safeguard it. We would all be pissed if someone hacked Google and stole a bunch of our data, and Google wouldn't make as much money selling personalized ads.

The only way Google can meet its obligations in regards to safely holding our data is to keep it between us and them.

The only way Google can meet its obligations in regards to safely holding our data is to keep it between us and them. Once you allow any other company access through its product, you either need to have a ready-made solution or you risk that data being used by another company.

Simply put, if Google were to allow third parties access, even "trustworthy" third parties like Opera or Microsoft, it would have to have a pre-built set of APIs that control things like encryption, destination, and authentication in order to make sure none of that data could be exposed. Google doesn't think that the Brave Browser is somehow going to gain 66% of the browser market even if it allows the company to use Chrome sync.

The good news

Google's cloud "services" allow you to sign into and use any of its products and will continue to do so even after the March 15 deadline. None of that is going to change. And if you build Chromium for personal use, you can even include Chrome sync through its cloud platform APIs and Services Library for free. You're simply rate-limited and can only use the API a certain number of times in a set time period, which is fine for your own pet project Chromium browser. Developers who build Chromium for commercial services — Brave has to make money somehow, right? — might have to pay for this sort of access, though.

There are a lot of things Google does that we dislike. I could write a whole series of articles about them, in fact. But given Google's new policies around third-party cookies and better anonymization of user data, cutting off free unfettered access to sensitive private APIs that can sync your passwords and credit card numbers actually makes sense. I have been told I can be a little tough on Google and the decisions it makes, but that's because I expect it to always do better.

This time, Google actually is.



Source: androidcentral

Popular posts from this blog

Apple and Meta Reportedly Discussed AI Partnership for iOS 18

Apple has held discussions with Meta about integrating the Facebook owner's AI model into iOS 18 as part of its Apple Intelligence feature set, according to a report over the weekend. Meta launched Llama 2, its large language model, in July 2023, and in April, the company released the latest versions of its AI models, called Llama 3 . The Wall Street Journal reports that the two longtime rivals have held talks about offering Meta's model as an additional option to OpenAI's ChatGPT. The paywalled report notes that the discussions haven't been finalized and could fall through. As part of Apple Intelligence, Apple has announced a partnership with OpenAI that will allow Siri to access ChatGPT directly in iOS 18, iPadOS 18, and macOS Sequoia to provide better responses in relevant situations. Using ChatGPT will be optional, so users with concerns about the technology can abstain and still make use of Apple's own new AI features. Speaking at WWDC 2024, Apple's

Apple Wasn't Interested in AI Partnership With Meta Due to Privacy Concerns

Apple turned down an AI partnership with Facebook parent company Meta due to privacy concerns, according to a report from Bloomberg . Meta and Apple had a brief discussion about a possible partnership in March, but the talks did not progress and Apple does not plan to integrate Meta's large language model (LLM) into iOS. Over the weekend, The Wall Street Journal suggested that Apple and Meta were in active discussions about integrating Llama, Facebook's LLM, into iOS 18 as part of Apple Intelligence. The report suggested that the discussions were ongoing had not been finalized, but Bloomberg 's follow-up indicates Apple never seriously considered a partnership. Preliminary talks happened at the same time that Apple began discussions with OpenAI and Google parent company Alphabet, but Apple decided not to move on to a more formal discussion because "it doesn't see that company's privacy practices as stringent enough." Apple did end up signing a d

iPhone 13 Pro vs. iPhone 16 Pro: 60+ Upgrades to Expect

The iPhone 16 Pro is set to succeed 2023's iPhone 15 Pro , introducing over 25 new features and improvements to Apple's high-end smartphones. With many users adopting three-year upgrade cycles, plenty of iPhone 13 Pro owners will be looking to upgrade to the ‌iPhone 16 Pro‌ later this year, so this guide breaks down every major difference you should be aware of between the two generations based on rumors. The ‌‌iPhone 13‌‌ Pro debuted in 2021, introducing a brighter display with ProMotion technology for refresh rates up to 120Hz, the A15 Bionic chip, a telephoto camera with 3x optical zoom, macro photography and photographic styles, Cinematic mode for recording videos with shallow depth of field, ProRes video recording, a 1TB storage option, and up to five hours of additional battery life. Three years later, the ‌iPhone 16 Pro‌ is expected to offer over 60 upgrades. All of the changes the ‌iPhone 16 Pro‌ models are expected to feature compared to their 2021 predecessors

Here Are the macOS Sequoia Features Intel Macs Won't Support

When Apple released macOS Monterey in 2021, some key features required a Mac with Apple silicon. The same scenario played out with macOS Ventura in 2022, and then again the following year with the release of macOS Sonoma. With macOS Sequoia set to arrive in the fall, which new features can Intel Mac owners expect to be unavailable to them this time around? Apple says that macOS Sequoia is compatible with the same Macs as macOS Sonoma, but Apple's fine print reveals that certain new features won't work on Intel machines. If you're still on an Intel Mac, here's what you won't have access to. Apple Intelligence Apple Intelligence , a deeply integrated, personalized AI feature set for Apple devices that uses cutting-edge generative artificial intelligence to enhance the user experience, won't be available on Intel Macs. Apple says the advanced features require its M1 chip or later, so if your Mac was released before November 2020, you're out of luck. T