Skip to main content

A limited Google Pixel 5a launch may be a smarter strategy than you think

You've got to pick your battles.

As reported last week, Google is drastically scaling back the Pixel A-line this year. Rather than the relatively wide launch like the Pixel 4a of last year, it's launching the new Pixel 5a 5G in only two countries — the U.S. and Japan. Even for Google's modest Pixel ambitions, this is unlikely to be a good sign. But rather than dwell on the doom and gloom scenarios, there are some things we can take away from Google's revised strategy.

First and most obviously, Google's Pixel 5a is launching. Despite the chip shortage that's plaguing the world, the company is going ahead with this. If Google did want to scale back on its hardware ambitions and only focus on one device, it had the perfect opportunity to cancel the Pixel 5a. It didn't even need to comment on the Pixel 5a rumors. After all, reports of the Pixel 4a XL being canceled did nothing to stop the Pixel 4a 5G from launching (and Google didn't comment on those rumors either). That Google did speak up means that the Pixel A-line is still important in Google's overall strategy.

Reports of the 4a 5G's death were premature, yet Google didn't comment.

So what could that strategy be? Google is likely under no illusions at this point about the sales viability of the Pixel line, and dropping out of markets seems a strange way to go about it regardless.

When we spoke to TechSpotential's Avi Greengart about Google's odd move, he told Android Central:

We don't have complete information on how well Google's Pixels are selling, but I'm confident that no Pixel variant sells as well compared to Samsung's Galaxy A or Galaxy S. Google can also be forgiven for focusing limited component availability on the markets where it does most of its volume. While Google certainly wants to expand its global footprint, it cannot afford to lose momentum — and carrier attention — in the U.S.

When one considers that Japan is the other market that Google kept the Pixel 5a this year, it becomes a little clearer why Google dropped out from the markets that it did, and why it stuck to the ones that it did.

Talking about the A-series in general, Android Central's Jeramy Johnson opined:

[The "a" series] is about delivering a flagship (or near-flagship) level software experience and cameras capable of outperforming phones that cost hundreds of dollars more. As someone who has access to a lot of great devices, I still chose the Pixel 4a as my primary phone.

In other words, the Pixel-A series fits the demographic of "really good Android phone that's cheap and has a great camera." In those markets that Google has pulled out of — the UK, Spain, etc — you'll find that niche already filled in by other Android OEMs who offer cheap phones that are either as good or even better than the Pixel. Whether it's by the likes of value-oriented brands in Xiaomi, Oppo, or even more premium ones like Samsung, the Pixel "A" hasn't quite been as competitive as it could be over the past year. You could argue the software experience sets it apart, but a comparison of sales lays to rest that line of reasoning.

Cheap phones from Google's rivals have gotten really good this year.

Now then, if you were to look over to Japan or the U.S., it's a little less rosy of a picture. When it comes to Japan, the country has never quite fallen in love with Chinese phones (though that's possibly set to change). Samsung, for its part, had to pull its branding from its phones for a time to attract sales, so you don't need me to tell you that it's not seeing the same levels of success there as it does in other countries.

Meanwhile, an intense distrust of China lingers in the U.S., and it's unlikely that Chinese OEMs will break into the U.S. market in the current climate. In other words, there are market gaps in both countries that the Pixel A-series slots into, and other international spaces where it makes strategic sense to retreat temporarily.

Google's staying where it's needed and leaving where it's not. Google isn't obviously going to leave its home market, and the deal with T-Mobile could help replicate Verizon's earlier deal that bolstered the first Pixel. Greengart noted:

All large Chinese brands have looked beyond Europe to the U.S. as a way to expand beyond Asia, but most have found it difficult to break into U.S. carriers. Google has long had at least some distribution at U.S. carriers, and recently gotten a commitment from T-Mobile to carry the full Pixel line, so that is another reason for Google to prioritize the U.S. market.

Of course, Google does control Android as a whole. That does seem obvious and not worth mentioning, right? What often gets lost in discussions about Google and Pixels and markets and all that is that even if Google fails to capture one market or the other, its partners can still do so. The Pixel 3a was important when cheap Android phones were crap, the 4a kept that importance when its competitors had poor cameras. With the Galaxy A52 5G and Redmi Note 10 around, the cheap Android phone experience is legitimately good. In the midst of a chip shortage, Google doesn't need to work harder than it has to.

Still so good

Google Pixel 4a

$349 at Amazon $350 at Best Buy $349 at B&H

Almost a year on, the 4a is still the one to beat.

While new entries are starting to try squeezing in on the Pixel 4a's pocket-sized blend of price and performance perfection, none have actually dethroned the value king quite yet. And for the countries that don't get the Pixel 5a, the 4a will continue to be sold for another year as that value continues to grow with deeper discounts.

Source: androidcentral

Popular posts from this blog

FCC approves broadband 'nutrition labels' to help you shop for internet

The FCC is pushing nutrition labels for internet providers. What you need to know The FCC has voted to move forward with new rules for ISPs to display nutrition labels. The proposed rulemaking would mandate ISPs to display relevant speed and pricing information to consumers. This should make it easier for consumers to make an informed decision on their broadband. The FCC voted unanimously on a plan that would allow consumers to make better decisions about their broadband internet. The proposal will require internet service providers (ISPs) - including many of the best wireless carriers in the U.S. — to display "nutrition labels" that display relevant service information for consumers at point-of-sale. This includes internet speeds, allowances, and clear information on rates. "If you walk into any grocery store and pull boxes of cereal from the shelves, you can easily compare calories and carbohydrates," FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel said in a statemen

Yandex spins out self-driving car unit from its Uber JV, invests $150M into newco

Self-driving cars are still many years away from becoming a ubiquitous reality, but today one of the bigger efforts to build and develop them is taking a significant step out as part of its strategy to be at the forefront for when they do. Yandex — the publicly-traded Russian tech giant that started as a search engine but has expanded into a number of other, related areas (similar to US counterpart Google) — today announced that it is spinning out its self-driving car unit from MLU BV — a ride-hailing and food delivery joint venture it operates in partnership with Uber. The move comes amid reports that Yandex and Uber were eyeing up an IPO for MLU  last year. At the time, the JV was estimated to be valued at around $7.7 billion. It’s not clear how those plans will have been impacted in recent months, with COVID-19 putting huge pressure on ride-hailing and food-delivery businesses globally, and IPOs generally down compared to a year ago. In that context, spinning out the unit could

Slack’s new integration deal with AWS could also be about tweaking Microsoft

Slack and Amazon announced a big integration late yesterday afternoon. As part of the deal, Slack will use Amazon Chime for its call feature, while reiterating its commitment to use AWS as its preferred cloud provider to run its infrastructure. At the same time, AWS has agreed to use Slack for internal communications. Make no mistake, this is a big deal as the SaaS communications tool increases its ties with AWS, but this agreement could also be about slighting Microsoft and its rival Teams product by making a deal with a cloud rival. In the past Slack CEO Stewart Butterfield has had choice words for Microsoft saying the Redmond technology giant sees his company as an “existential threat.” Whether that’s true or not — Teams is but one piece of a huge technology company — it’s impossible not to look at the deal in this context. Aligning more deeply with AWS sends a message to Microsoft, whose Azure infrastructure services compete with AWS. Butterfield didn’t say that of course

Elon Musk sends yet another notice trying to terminate the Twitter deal

Kristen Radtke / The Verge; Getty Images Elon Musk has sent a third letter to Twitter attempting to terminate his $44 billion acquisition of the company . Musk’s legal team cited Twitter’s multimillion dollar severance payment to former security chief and whistleblower Peiter Zatko as a violation of the merger agreement and a reason to end the deal. The letter, dated September 9th, was sent to Twitter’s chief legal officer Vijaya Gadde, and was included in a filing Twitter made with the SEC on Friday (which you can read at the bottom of this article). Last month, Zatko made headlines by accusing Twitter of misleading investors about the number of bots on the service, failing to delete users’ data, and having poor security practices, among other things. Musk jumped on the accusations, citing them in his second termination letter and subpoenaing Zatko to testify in the lawsuit. Zatko was set to be deposed on Friday. Elon Musk sent his first letter of termination in July , say