Skip to main content

What's the deal with Apple's new Podcast Subscriptions?

Paying podcasting forward

Apple announced several new products and services at its Spring Loaded event this week, including an updated Apple TV 4K, new colorful iMacs, and a new iPad Pro powered by Apple's desktop-grade M1 SOC. Aside from all of that pretty hardware, though, one of the most interesting announcements (at least, in my opinion) and one of the most widely-anticipated (save for AirTags), was Apple's new Podcast Subscriptions service. While a paid podcasting platform may have been expected, the form in which it was unveiled might not have been. So what exactly is Apple Podcast Subscriptions, and how does it stack up vs. premium options from competitors?

What is Apple Podcast Subscriptions

Ever since Apple helped popularize the podcasting genre (and its iPod music players even lent part of their name to the concept), iTunes, and later Apple Podcasts, has served as the most popular place to access this plethora of content. Even better, podcasts have largely been free to consumers, with creators relying on advertising revenue and other supplementary methods as sources of income. Now that podcasts have become such a popular medium, there are more opportunities than ever for indie creators and larger publishers to make money from their content.

Enter Apple Podcast Subscriptionswhy not Podcasts+? Who knows! Essentially, this is both a platform (for creators) and a paid service (for consumers). It allows podcasters to earn money by developing premium content and enticements, and it allows consumers to support their favorite creators and shows directly.

For $20/year, podcast creators will be able to participate in the Apple Podcasting Program, which will get them access to all the tools and analytics that they need to develop successful subscription programs. The podcasters get to decide how much to charge and what kinds of content and tiers to offer, including free, freemium, and paid options. Freemium and paid options could include ad-free podcasts, trailers and teasers, early access or archive access, exclusive content, and even serial content. Creators will also be able to curate their own podcast channels.

If this kind of support model sounds familiar, it's probably because you recognize it from sites like Patreon or YouTube Channel Memberships. It is interesting because it means that a podcast can earn more money based on how successful it is. This model may also be attractive to listeners, as they only pay to support the shows they truly love and don't necessarily miss out on what they don't want.

How others are making money on podcasting

It is not yet clear if Apple will bring the new Apple Podcasts app and Podcast Subscriptions to Android, but it wouldn't be unprecedented. After all, Apple Music has been on Android from day one; technically, before there even was an Apple Music, it was Beats Music. It makes perfect sense that Apple would want to spread out the potential to earn service revenue on other operating systems and in other ecosystems. Heck, you can already access Apple Podcasts from third-party devices like the best Alexa speakers. Regardless, there are already several competing monetization methods among the best podcast apps on Android like Google Podcasts, Amazon Music, and Spotify, Amazon Music.

Google Podcasts

Let's start with the simplest. Google Podcasts is available on Android, iOS, and the web and is free to download and listen to. It doesn't currently offer any monetization options for podcast creators (other than their own in-episode ads). However, Google being Google, it hoovers up user data that it can then use for later ad personalization and targeting, which of course is how it makes the majority of its money. Google Podcasts does not currently produce or support its own original programming, though the door always remains open for such a possibility in the future.

Amazon Podcasts

Amazon Music and Audible approach making money from podcasts in a slightly different manner. Podcasts are freely available to all listeners (so long as the creator has uploaded them to Amazon's directory), but a listener does have to use the Amazon Music app or web portal if they want to be able to listen to one of Amazon's original podcast series that it has produced, or which it has acquired from its recent acquisition of Wondery.

As far as the creators' monetization options, they are still able to include their own in-episode ads (which they arrange directly or through an ad network), and the hosts involved with Amazon originals are compensated directly by Amazon.

Spotify Podcasts

Lastly, we come to Spotify. Like Amazon, Spotify has been busy the past few years buying up podcast publishers like Gimlet Media and Parcast in order to bolster its catalog of original content. Spotify, of course, offers listeners both premium and ad-supported subscription options, and all podcasts on Spotify are freely available to listeners at all tiers. However, as with Amazon, most of this original content can only be heard on Spotify and not on another podcast app.

For creators, Spotify offers a fairly comprehensive set of tools to help both amateurs and professionals create, edit, distribute and even monetize their content.

Aside from the tools linked to above, Spotify also owns launched as a phone-based app that let anyone easily create and distribute their own podcasts, but it also includes analytics, performance tools, and monetization options like the ability to earn ad revenue with no minimal listenership, the ability to do your own ad reads, and even the ability to raise funds directly from listeners. In addition to Patreon, these tools and services are what Apple's Podcast Subscriptions is in direct competition with.

What it all means for listeners

Apple may have popularized podcasts over a decade and a half ago, but it has been very slow to try to monetize the ecosystem for creators or for itself. While some companies like Luminary have tried to create premium podcasts and put them behind a paywall, the rest of the industry sought to incentivize new users to subscribe to their apps by making their original content only available on their respective services.

Models that helped creators support themselves and their content have been around and have been successful (see Patreon and Anchor as examples), but Apple's move into this realm could really move the needle for content producers. But questions remain. Will it be good for everyone involved, including listeners? Will Apple run roughshod over other competitors like Patreon and Anchor?

What do you think about Apple Podcast Subscriptions? If you have an Apple device, do you think you'll subscribe to your favorite creators there?

Listen to the AC Podcast!

Regardless of which podcast player or service you prefer, be sure to subscribe so that you don't miss the next Android Central Podcast!

  • Subscribe in Spotify: Audio
  • Subscribe in iTunes: Audio
  • Subscribe in RSS: Audio
  • Download directly: Audio

Source: androidcentral

Popular posts from this blog

FCC approves broadband 'nutrition labels' to help you shop for internet

The FCC is pushing nutrition labels for internet providers. What you need to know The FCC has voted to move forward with new rules for ISPs to display nutrition labels. The proposed rulemaking would mandate ISPs to display relevant speed and pricing information to consumers. This should make it easier for consumers to make an informed decision on their broadband. The FCC voted unanimously on a plan that would allow consumers to make better decisions about their broadband internet. The proposal will require internet service providers (ISPs) - including many of the best wireless carriers in the U.S. — to display "nutrition labels" that display relevant service information for consumers at point-of-sale. This includes internet speeds, allowances, and clear information on rates. "If you walk into any grocery store and pull boxes of cereal from the shelves, you can easily compare calories and carbohydrates," FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel said in a statemen

Yandex spins out self-driving car unit from its Uber JV, invests $150M into newco

Self-driving cars are still many years away from becoming a ubiquitous reality, but today one of the bigger efforts to build and develop them is taking a significant step out as part of its strategy to be at the forefront for when they do. Yandex — the publicly-traded Russian tech giant that started as a search engine but has expanded into a number of other, related areas (similar to US counterpart Google) — today announced that it is spinning out its self-driving car unit from MLU BV — a ride-hailing and food delivery joint venture it operates in partnership with Uber. The move comes amid reports that Yandex and Uber were eyeing up an IPO for MLU  last year. At the time, the JV was estimated to be valued at around $7.7 billion. It’s not clear how those plans will have been impacted in recent months, with COVID-19 putting huge pressure on ride-hailing and food-delivery businesses globally, and IPOs generally down compared to a year ago. In that context, spinning out the unit could

Slack’s new integration deal with AWS could also be about tweaking Microsoft

Slack and Amazon announced a big integration late yesterday afternoon. As part of the deal, Slack will use Amazon Chime for its call feature, while reiterating its commitment to use AWS as its preferred cloud provider to run its infrastructure. At the same time, AWS has agreed to use Slack for internal communications. Make no mistake, this is a big deal as the SaaS communications tool increases its ties with AWS, but this agreement could also be about slighting Microsoft and its rival Teams product by making a deal with a cloud rival. In the past Slack CEO Stewart Butterfield has had choice words for Microsoft saying the Redmond technology giant sees his company as an “existential threat.” Whether that’s true or not — Teams is but one piece of a huge technology company — it’s impossible not to look at the deal in this context. Aligning more deeply with AWS sends a message to Microsoft, whose Azure infrastructure services compete with AWS. Butterfield didn’t say that of course

Xbox One S vs. Xbox One X: Which should you buy? We live and breathe tech, and also gaming, with every member of Windows Central rocking either an Xbox One console or PC gaming rig. We've compared and contrasted every iteration of Xbox One to bring you this guide. Xbox One X Raw 4K power From $299 at Amazon Pros Has thousands of games 4K media apps, Blu-ray discs, and games IR blaster for TV controls, Amazon Echo for voice controls Improved HDD speeds for faster loading times Cons More expensive at around $500 RRP Requires a 4K TV to get the most out of it The Xbox One X is the world's most powerful games console, running the latest games with the crispest, detailed visuals on TV sets with 4K HDR support. Xbox One S More affordable From $226 at Amazon Pros Has thousands of games 4K media apps and Blu-ray IR blaster for TV controls, Amazon Echo for voice controls More affordable at around $300 RRP Cons No 4K games Games run worse, even on a 1080p TV The Xbox One S i