Skip to main content

Here's why Jio's $87 Android phone won't give Google its next billion users

Even at $87, the JioPhone Next is too costly for India's large feature phone userbase.

With over 500 million users, India is the second-largest smartphone market in the world. What's particularly noteworthy is Android's dominance in the region; Google's operating system accounts for over 96% of the market share in India, with a userbase of over 480 million. A majority of the sales are skewed toward the budget segment, with the best Android phones under $300 getting most of the attention.

But Google wants more. India has a user base of nearly 400 million still on feature phones, and Google has been on a mission to switch these customers over to Android. The latest salvo in those efforts is a partnership with Jio — the largest carrier in India — for the JioPhone Next, an entry-level phone running a custom version of Android Go that's debuting at just ₹6,499 ($87).

Over the last decade, Google tried a lot of initiatives to target the entry-level segment. The first wave of Android One phones devices were made in partnership with local hardware brands like Micromax, Lava, and Karbonn, but that program fizzled out after a year. Although the devices had pure Android and guaranteed updates, the hardware was underwhelming for the time, and Google gave little to no effort in marketing the program, which meant that the users that would have benefitted from these devices didn't even know they existed.

Google then switched gears and launched Android Go, a lightweight version of Android tailored to run on low-end hardware. It teamed up with Nokia and Xiaomi to launch devices in India, and while they had a lot to offer — particularly against $100 Android devices at the time — they didn't get much in the way of marketing either.

Jio is the ideal partner for Google's entry-level efforts in India.

By partnering with Jio, Google is aiming to fix its mistakes. Jio is a behemoth in India, with the carrier touting over 433 million subscribers. That's one of the reasons Google invested $4.5 billion in Jio last year; it needs Jio if it wants to make any meaningful inroads into the vast feature phone market and bring these users over to Android.

And at the outset, it looks like that's what the JioPhone Next is designed to achieve. The phone has a 5.45-inch 720p screen and features a Snapdragon 215 chipset, 2GB of RAM, 32GB storage, MicroSD slot, 4G with dual-SIM connectivity, 13MP camera, 8MP front camera, and a 3500mAh battery.

In short, the hardware is very decent for a sub-$100 phone, but that's not the differentiator here. That honor belongs to the software; the JioPhone Next runs a customized version of Android Go tailored for the hardware, and Jio has worked with Google to bundle a lot of software features. For example, there's a read-aloud feature that works in several Indian languages, and the Next is designed to be voice-first — allowing users to talk to Google Assistant in Hindi — and it leverages Google Lens to instantly translate on-screen text or by taking a photo.

Google's next billion users will have to come from India.

You also get a dedicated Night Mode for the camera and filters, and the phone comes with Jio's digital suite of services, including its live TV service, on-demand music, TV shows, and movie streaming platform, and more. According to IDC India Research Director Navkendar Singh, the JioPhone Next is a win-win for Google and Jio. "Jio wants more data, and the ultimate play for Jio from its Jio Platform monetization is to get smartphone users to come in over the next few years and start using Jio services."

"Google wants to connect the next half a billion users to its services, which only India can deliver (with its grossly under-penetrated smartphone market) and ultimately monetize from the hitherto unconnected users," says Singh. But there's a problem: pricing. The device retails for $87, and while Jio is offering financing options that start at just ₹300 ($4) a month, Singh notes that it is "priced out of the reach" of the target userbase.

"At ₹6,499 ($87) it is grossly priced out of the reach of that huge 370-400 million feature phone users, half of which use a feature phone priced less than $15 and spend less than $2 per month on their monthly voice plan. Expecting millions of these users to buy a new device which is much more expensive but less robust, has worse battery life, and will wear/tear faster than their current feature phone is not realistic."

Ultimately, Google needs a sub-$30 device to get India's feature phone users to switch to Android.

Instead, Singh says that the JioPhone Next will sell a few million units and end up targeting users eyeing phones in the $75 to $110 segment — the playground of Xiaomi and Realme — as well as the refurbished smartphone market. "In that sense it will not give Google, Jio and Android its next billion users, organically," noted Singh.

Four years ago, Google CEO Sundar Pichai posited that smartphones need to be sold under $30 to target the next wave of users willing to make the move to Android, and the same holds true today. While Jio's latest phone has a lot to offer, it isn't a viable choice for the hundreds of millions of feature phone users.

That said, Jio is the best chance that Google has at attracting these users. Its scale combined with its marketing push and content portfolio makes Jio the ideal partner for Google's mission to amass its next billion Android users.

"Any serious attempt for localization of content and services by a service provider of Jio's caliber when partnered with Google can deliver long-lasting positive results to both sets of end-users. And with Jio's push in marketing, reach and services portfolio, it can help in getting more users to use voice and vernacular capabilities, which is much more convenient for a user," said Singh.



Source: androidcentral

Popular posts from this blog

FCC approves broadband 'nutrition labels' to help you shop for internet

The FCC is pushing nutrition labels for internet providers. What you need to know The FCC has voted to move forward with new rules for ISPs to display nutrition labels. The proposed rulemaking would mandate ISPs to display relevant speed and pricing information to consumers. This should make it easier for consumers to make an informed decision on their broadband. The FCC voted unanimously on a plan that would allow consumers to make better decisions about their broadband internet. The proposal will require internet service providers (ISPs) - including many of the best wireless carriers in the U.S. — to display "nutrition labels" that display relevant service information for consumers at point-of-sale. This includes internet speeds, allowances, and clear information on rates. "If you walk into any grocery store and pull boxes of cereal from the shelves, you can easily compare calories and carbohydrates," FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel said in a statemen

Yandex spins out self-driving car unit from its Uber JV, invests $150M into newco

Self-driving cars are still many years away from becoming a ubiquitous reality, but today one of the bigger efforts to build and develop them is taking a significant step out as part of its strategy to be at the forefront for when they do. Yandex — the publicly-traded Russian tech giant that started as a search engine but has expanded into a number of other, related areas (similar to US counterpart Google) — today announced that it is spinning out its self-driving car unit from MLU BV — a ride-hailing and food delivery joint venture it operates in partnership with Uber. The move comes amid reports that Yandex and Uber were eyeing up an IPO for MLU  last year. At the time, the JV was estimated to be valued at around $7.7 billion. It’s not clear how those plans will have been impacted in recent months, with COVID-19 putting huge pressure on ride-hailing and food-delivery businesses globally, and IPOs generally down compared to a year ago. In that context, spinning out the unit could

Slack’s new integration deal with AWS could also be about tweaking Microsoft

Slack and Amazon announced a big integration late yesterday afternoon. As part of the deal, Slack will use Amazon Chime for its call feature, while reiterating its commitment to use AWS as its preferred cloud provider to run its infrastructure. At the same time, AWS has agreed to use Slack for internal communications. Make no mistake, this is a big deal as the SaaS communications tool increases its ties with AWS, but this agreement could also be about slighting Microsoft and its rival Teams product by making a deal with a cloud rival. In the past Slack CEO Stewart Butterfield has had choice words for Microsoft saying the Redmond technology giant sees his company as an “existential threat.” Whether that’s true or not — Teams is but one piece of a huge technology company — it’s impossible not to look at the deal in this context. Aligning more deeply with AWS sends a message to Microsoft, whose Azure infrastructure services compete with AWS. Butterfield didn’t say that of course

Xbox One S vs. Xbox One X: Which should you buy?

http://bit.ly/2v1agl5 We live and breathe tech, and also gaming, with every member of Windows Central rocking either an Xbox One console or PC gaming rig. We've compared and contrasted every iteration of Xbox One to bring you this guide. Xbox One X Raw 4K power From $299 at Amazon Pros Has thousands of games 4K media apps, Blu-ray discs, and games IR blaster for TV controls, Amazon Echo for voice controls Improved HDD speeds for faster loading times Cons More expensive at around $500 RRP Requires a 4K TV to get the most out of it The Xbox One X is the world's most powerful games console, running the latest games with the crispest, detailed visuals on TV sets with 4K HDR support. Xbox One S More affordable From $226 at Amazon Pros Has thousands of games 4K media apps and Blu-ray IR blaster for TV controls, Amazon Echo for voice controls More affordable at around $300 RRP Cons No 4K games Games run worse, even on a 1080p TV The Xbox One S i