Skip to main content

Amazfit GTS 3 vs. GTS 2: Should you get the newer model?


Amazfit GTS 3

The Amazfit GTS 3 maintained almost all of the GTS 2's positive aspects save one: the speaker. Still, you get a larger display, better battery life, and more sporting modes as opposed to the Amazfit GTS 2.

+ Vivid 1.75-inch AMOLED panel
+ Loads of health and wellness features
+ Alexa built-in
+ Newer Bluetooth 5.1 LE
+ Improved battery life
+ 5 ATM water-resistance

- No speaker
- Lacks third-party app support
- No NFC

Amazfit GTS 2

The older Amazfit GTS 2 still costs the same as its older sibling, even though it has poorer battery life and a smaller display. It does however have a speaker, along with Alexa onboard, the same robust waterproofing, and plenty of health and wellness features.

+ Bright 1.65-inch AMOLED display
+ Supports Alexa
+ Plenty of health and wellness modes
+ Speaker onboard
+ 5 ATM waterproof rating


- No third-party apps
- Doesn't have NFC
- Battery life not as good as GTS 3

Amazfit's GTS lineup features square displays and focuses on serving looks first and foremost, despite sitting in the budget tier of smartwatches. The Amazfit GTS 2 and successor GTS 3 do not differ much in terms of looks, much like the gear hidden away inside their sleek bodies. You get the same lightweight, aluminum alloy build and identical screen sizes. We're not complaining because both smartwatches look fabulous and feel comfortable when worn for long periods.

Luckily, the Amazfit GTS 3 maintains the same 5 ATM waterproofing and comes with Alexa built-in just like the GTS 2. While the newer Amazfit wearable improves on many aspects of its younger sibling, some things are amiss. This leads us to question whether upgrading to or going for the newer model is a worthwhile decision. This requires us to delve into the matter on a deeper level, which is what we will do now.

Amazfit GTS 3 vs. GTS 2: Popping the hood

Comparing the technical specifications of both GTS models reveals a few minor differences. First, notice that the Amazfit GTS 3 has a newer Bluetooth 5.1 LE module. The last-gen GTS 2 features the older Bluetooth 5.0 chip. This means the GTS 3 pairs faster and also consumes less battery on your phone while connected to it. This also cuts down power consumption on the watch, allowing you to get a higher uptime from the GTS 3 versus the GTS 2.

Category Amazfit GTS 3 Amazfit GTS 2
Display 1.75-inch AMOLED 1.65-inch AMOLED
Operating system Zepp OS Zepp OS
Memory 3GB 3GB
Battery 250mAh, 12 days on average use 246mAh, 7 days on average use
Water-resistance 5 ATM 5 ATM
Connectivity Bluetooth 5.1 LE Bluetooth 5.0
GPS ✔️ ✔️
NFC
Heart-rate sensor ✔️ ✔️
SPO2 sensor ✔️ ✔️
Sleep tracking ✔️ ✔️
Microphone ✔️ ✔️
Speaker ✔️
Voice assistant Alexa built-in Alexa built-in
Dimensions 42.4 x 36 x 8.8mm, 24.4g 42.8 x 35.6 x 9.7mm, 24.7g
Band size 20mm 20mm

Both Amazfit smartwatches use the same high-quality AMOLED panel that is bright even in daylight. The GTS 3 has a leg up on the GTS 2 thanks to its slightly larger 1.75-inch display. It also weighs just a tad lighter, tipping the scales in the Amazfit GTS 3's favor. This one's a personal preference, but we feel that the rotating button on the GTS 2 doesn't look as refined as the one on the GTS 3.

There are plenty of sporting modes, fitness trackers, and other health options baked into the Amazfit GTS 2 and GTS 3, with the exact numbers tallying up to 90 modes on the former and 120 modes on the latter. GPS helps you keep track of your workouts on both watches. You won't miss out on sleep tracking, blood-oxygen measuring, or heart-rate monitoring on either GTS variant. Unfortunately, the GTS 3 and GTS 2 both lack support for third-party apps and NFC for contactless payments.

Surprisingly, there is something that the new-gen GTS 3 did away with and we're not pleased about it. Unlike the Amazfit GTS 2, the GTS 3 does not have a speaker onboard. This means that even if you do store any music on your smartwatch, you have to rely on a decent pair of Bluetooth earbuds for audio playback. It also means that to answer calls with your GTS 3, you'll have to use your phone or headphones once again. At least both Amazfit watches still share the same memory specification, 3GB, allowing you to keep select files within your GTS watch.

Amazfit GTS 3 vs. GTS 2: Which one should you get?

We're at the finish line now and the answer is still a little murky. In truth, it all boils down to what you need the Amazfit watch to do. Both the GTS 3 and the GTS 2 are good budget smartwatches, with a couple of disadvantages here and there. Let's bring up a key point that we have yet to highlight. Yes, we're talking about the actual cost of owning one of these wearable devices.

One would think the older Amazfit GTS model would cost lesser, but that's not the case here. Priced at $180 on Amazon, the GTS 2 costs exactly the same as its newer counterpart. If you prioritize having a speaker on your watch, then buy the Amazfit GTS 2. It doesn't miss out on much, bringing you the convenience of Alexa and a healthy number of sporting modes.

However, those of you who need a little more screen real-estate, better battery life, and a few more sporting modes are better suited for the Amazfit GTS 3. The newer Amazfit smartwatch looks much better than the GTS 2, even if it is by a narrow margin.

For those of you who are wondering whether you should upgrade your Amazfit GTS 2 to the newer generation — don't do it. There's no real need for you to switch over to the GTS 3 and lose your GTS 2's speaker functionality. Until Amazfit launches the GTS 4, the GTS 2 will not be outmoded.

Amazfit GTS 2

The good ol' Amazfit GTS 2 hasn't gotten cheaper, but it hasn't aged poorly either. Its internals are robust and it beats the GTS 3 in the audio department thanks to the built-in speaker.

Amazfit GTS 3

The Amazfit GTS 3 outperforms the GTS 2 in almost every department. You get a bigger screen, a longer uptime, and almost twice the amount of sporting modes. What it doesn't have is a speaker and the ability to answer calls directly.

Popular posts from this blog

FCC approves broadband 'nutrition labels' to help you shop for internet

The FCC is pushing nutrition labels for internet providers. What you need to know The FCC has voted to move forward with new rules for ISPs to display nutrition labels. The proposed rulemaking would mandate ISPs to display relevant speed and pricing information to consumers. This should make it easier for consumers to make an informed decision on their broadband. The FCC voted unanimously on a plan that would allow consumers to make better decisions about their broadband internet. The proposal will require internet service providers (ISPs) - including many of the best wireless carriers in the U.S. — to display "nutrition labels" that display relevant service information for consumers at point-of-sale. This includes internet speeds, allowances, and clear information on rates. "If you walk into any grocery store and pull boxes of cereal from the shelves, you can easily compare calories and carbohydrates," FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel said in a statemen

Slack’s new integration deal with AWS could also be about tweaking Microsoft

Slack and Amazon announced a big integration late yesterday afternoon. As part of the deal, Slack will use Amazon Chime for its call feature, while reiterating its commitment to use AWS as its preferred cloud provider to run its infrastructure. At the same time, AWS has agreed to use Slack for internal communications. Make no mistake, this is a big deal as the SaaS communications tool increases its ties with AWS, but this agreement could also be about slighting Microsoft and its rival Teams product by making a deal with a cloud rival. In the past Slack CEO Stewart Butterfield has had choice words for Microsoft saying the Redmond technology giant sees his company as an “existential threat.” Whether that’s true or not — Teams is but one piece of a huge technology company — it’s impossible not to look at the deal in this context. Aligning more deeply with AWS sends a message to Microsoft, whose Azure infrastructure services compete with AWS. Butterfield didn’t say that of course

Yandex spins out self-driving car unit from its Uber JV, invests $150M into newco

Self-driving cars are still many years away from becoming a ubiquitous reality, but today one of the bigger efforts to build and develop them is taking a significant step out as part of its strategy to be at the forefront for when they do. Yandex — the publicly-traded Russian tech giant that started as a search engine but has expanded into a number of other, related areas (similar to US counterpart Google) — today announced that it is spinning out its self-driving car unit from MLU BV — a ride-hailing and food delivery joint venture it operates in partnership with Uber. The move comes amid reports that Yandex and Uber were eyeing up an IPO for MLU  last year. At the time, the JV was estimated to be valued at around $7.7 billion. It’s not clear how those plans will have been impacted in recent months, with COVID-19 putting huge pressure on ride-hailing and food-delivery businesses globally, and IPOs generally down compared to a year ago. In that context, spinning out the unit could

Elon Musk sends yet another notice trying to terminate the Twitter deal

Kristen Radtke / The Verge; Getty Images Elon Musk has sent a third letter to Twitter attempting to terminate his $44 billion acquisition of the company . Musk’s legal team cited Twitter’s multimillion dollar severance payment to former security chief and whistleblower Peiter Zatko as a violation of the merger agreement and a reason to end the deal. The letter, dated September 9th, was sent to Twitter’s chief legal officer Vijaya Gadde, and was included in a filing Twitter made with the SEC on Friday (which you can read at the bottom of this article). Last month, Zatko made headlines by accusing Twitter of misleading investors about the number of bots on the service, failing to delete users’ data, and having poor security practices, among other things. Musk jumped on the accusations, citing them in his second termination letter and subpoenaing Zatko to testify in the lawsuit. Zatko was set to be deposed on Friday. Elon Musk sent his first letter of termination in July , say