Skip to main content

Ant-Man 3 might hold the key to a big Kang reveal in the MCU

Spoilers follow for Loki season 1.

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania star Jonathan Majors has teased that "different iterations" of Kang will appear in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU).

Speaking to Brazilian outlet Somos Geeks (skip to the 3:00 mark), Majors, who portrays Kang the Conqueror throughout Marvel's Multiverse Saga, suggested that we could see other versions of the iconic supervillain in forthcoming movies and TV shows.

That might not be a big spoiler. MCU fans who watched Loki season 1 on Disney Plus will know that Majors has already played one of Kang's other MCU variants – aka He Who Remains, who appears to be based on Immortus, one of Kang's comic-book variants. 

In Loki episode 6, He Who Remains also confirmed that other Kang variants would cross over into the MCU if Loki and Sylvie killed him, as He Who Remains is the only one who has managed to stop other universes (and Kangs) invading the MCU's so-called sacred timeline. Sylvie wound up murdering He Who Remains, thus helping to instigate the multiverse's arrival.

What's interesting about Majors' comments, though, is that he (or, rather, Marvel) don't use the word "variant" when they discuss the multiverse's numerous versions of Kang. Instead, a completely different description is used for the Marvel Phase 5 villain, which will certainly pique the interest of comic book fans.

"When they [Marvel] said there would be different iterations – that's actually the word they used, they didn't say variants," Majors revealed. "So when they said there is different iterations of this character, I thought 'Okay, cool, I'd like to take that on and have a stab at it.'"

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania will be the next Marvel movie to land in theaters. The superhero film will kickstart Phase 5 of the MCU, and, after a somewhat mixed bag in MCU Phase 4, hopefully get Marvel's cinematic juggernaut back on track.

Analysis: a vital multiversal distinction

He Who Remains smiles as he puts his feet on a table in Loki episode 6

He Who Remains is one of multiple Kang iterations. (Image credit: Marvel Studios/Disney Plus)

Spoilers follow for Doctor Strange 3 and Spider-Man: No Way Home.

Majors' and Marvel's "different iterations" distinction is an important one to address. After all, the term "variant" – in the context of the MCU, at least – has been used to describe and/or show various incarnations of popular Marvel characters.

Take Doctor Strange 2, for example. In that MCU film, we saw Benedict Cumberbatch play four versions of the Master of the Mystic Arts. We can class the other three as variants of the MCU's Doctor Strange because, aside from the different choices they made in their own universes, they appear to be the same character – someone with the same strengths, weaknesses, and personality – as the MCU's version.

The word "iteration" means something completely different for Kang. Its use implies that we'll see other versions of Kang in Phase 5 and Phase 6, but that they won't be the same character we saw in Loki season 1, or will see in Ant-Man 3.

In his chat with Somos Geeks, Majors revealed that each Kang iteration is from a "very particular world, and has to serve that world... they are a by-product of those worlds. They move and behave differently." In our view, this quote, coupled with Majors' earlier response, suggests we'll see some hugely significant versions of Kang brought to life in the MCU.

In Marvel comics, Kang – a time-traveling genius – has multiple variants. These include ancient Egyptian Pharoah Rama-Tut, a turn-of-the-century mayor named Victor Timely, the Doctor Doom-inspired Scarlet Centurion, Qeng Enterprises CEO Mister Gryphon, and the Young Avenger known as Iron Lad. These Kang variants exist in Marvel's comic book universe in different eras, are older or younger than Kang himself, and span the spectrum of good and evil.

And that's what makes Majors and Marvel's use of "different iterations" so significant. We might not just see the same version of Kang – someone who is the same age and has the same persona/ambitions as Ant-Man 3's version – appear in the MCU between now and Avengers: Secret Wars, which is scheduled to arrive in theaters in 2026. 

Instead, we could see Majors portray any or all of the above, which would make for plenty of crowd-pleasing moments on the big screen. We've already seen Marvel take a similar approach with Spider-Man: No Way Home, with Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield's Spider-Men, who are older and more experienced than Tom Holland's webslinger, team up with Holland's MCU Spider-Man to brilliant effect. Why wouldn't Marvel do likewise here, and have Majors play different versions of Kang at various stages of their lives and multiverse-conqueroring plans? We're crossing our fingers (including all of those of our own multiverse variants) that we're right with this theory.

For more Marvel-based content, read up on how to watch the Marvel movies in order. Alternatively, find out everything worth knowing about Loki season 2, or see which MCU TV series made it onto our best Disney Plus shows list.

Source: TechRadar

Popular posts from this blog

Code-generating tools could be more of a security hindrance than help

New research by a group of Stanford-affiliated researchers has uncovered that code-generating AI tools such as Github Copilot can present more security risks than many users may realize. The study looked specifically at Codex, a product of OpenAI, of which Elon Musk is among the co-founders.  Codex powers the Microsoft-owned GitHub Copilot platform, which is designed to make coding easier and more accessible by translating natural language into code and suggesting changes based on contextual evidence. AI-coding problems Lead co-author of the study, Neil Perry, explains that “code-generating systems are currently not a replacement for human developers”. The study asked 47 developers of differing abilities to use Codex for security-related problems, using Python, JavaScript and C programming languages. It concluded that the participants who relied on Codex were more likely to write insecure code compared with a control group. Read more > These are the best laptops for progr

Port of Lisbon hit by ransomware attack

One of Europe’s busiest seaports, the Port of Lisbon, has been hit with a ransomware attack that knocked some of its digital systems offline. "All safety protocols and response measures provided for this type of occurrence were quickly activated, the situation being monitored by the National Cybersecurity Center and the Judicial Police," a statement shared by the Port of Lisbon Administration (APL) with local media earlier this week said. The incident failed to impact the port’s operations, but did take its official website,, offline. LockBit taking responsibility "The Port of Lisbon Administration is working permanently and closely with all competent entities in order to guarantee the security of the systems and respective data," the statement concludes. While the company doesn’t explicitly say it was targeted with ransomware, the LockBit ransomware operator has added APL to its leaks website, taking responsibility for the hit.  The databas

This new Linux malware floods machines with cryptominers and DDoS bots

Cybersecurity researchers have spotted a new Linux malware downloader that targets poorly defended Linux servers with cryptocurrency miners and DDoS IRC bots. Researchers from ASEC discovered the attack after the Shell Script Compiler (SHC) used to create the downloader was uploaded to VirusTotal. Apparently, Korean users were the ones uploading the SHC, and it’s Korean users who are targets, as well. Further analysis has shown that the threat actors are going after poorly defended Linux servers, brute-forcing their way into administrator accounts over SSH.  Mining Monero Once they make their way in, they’ll either install a cryptocurrency miner, or a DDoS IRC bot. The miner being deployed is XMRig, arguably the most popular cryptocurrency miner among hackers. It uses the computing power of a victim's endpoints to generate Monero, a privacy-oriented cryptocurrency whose transactions are seemingly impossible to track, and whose users are allegedly impossible to identify. Fo

Twitter has hidden the chronological feed on iOS again – and I'm furious

In a controversial move, Twitter has brought back a feature that removes the 'Latest Tweets' view for users on iOS, which is something that many users, including me, hated back in March 2022 – and it's now rolling out. The first time the company decided to do this, 'Home' would appear first in a tab at the top, and there was no way of changing it so that 'Latest Tweets' would be the default view. It was reverted back after the company said it was a 'bug' for iOS users. This time though, it's no bug. Instead, it's 'For You' and 'Following' where you can only swipe between them now, which doesn't make much sense for a platform where you're using the platform to keep up to date with who you follow. It's a bizarre change that makes me ask – who wants this, especially during a time when its new owner, Elon Musk, is bringing in and reversing changes almost every week still? This one change will have big consequenc