Skip to main content

A Galaxy Watch Active with Android could be the best women's watch ever

Samsung has nailed the perfect small watch hardware — now give us the software.

For the last couple of years, the best Android smartwatches actually haven't run Android, they've run Samsung's Tizen. This means that Android watch-buyers had to choose between getting great hardware or getting access to the apps and services they actually want to use like Google Assistant and Google Pay.

But if reports from leaker extraordinaire Ice universe are to be believed — and they usually are — you may be able to get the best of all worlds in Samsung's next watch. Presumably the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 3 — since the Galaxy Watch 3 is only six months old — would be Samsung's first Android watch since the Samsung Gear Live in 2014, back when Wear OS was still called Android Wear.

While this change might seem like a downgrade to some, I think Wear OS could make the Galaxy Watch Active the best women's watch ever.

As I said before, Samsung has absolutely nailed the hardware on the Galaxy Watch Active series. It's the best small smartwatch I've ever worn while still packing almost two-day battery life, NFC tap-to-pay, and a great-looking little screen. While there are some great Wear OS watches, none of the truly good ones are small; they're all big, beefy watches like the TicWatch Pro 3.

For those with larger hands and thicker wrists, these watches are perfectly fine, but as a 5'2 woman, it makes me look like I'm wearing the Omnitrix. Sure, I could settle for a fitness tracker instead that sacrifices functionality for ultra-compact sizes, but fitness is a secondary function of my watch. Small Wear OS watches so far have either suffered for performance, battery, or both, while the Watch Active has been almost perfectly sized for smaller wrists. Samsung would be filling a noticeable gap in the Wear OS market — while also doubling the apps and services available to the watch's users.

My kingdom for Google Keep on a Galaxy Watch

Tizen's software is perfectly okay, but the app selection on the Galaxy Watch and Watch Active series has sucked compared to Wear OS. There are fewer apps in every category and there are almost no apps from big-name companies except for Spotify and Tidal. You also have to deal with Samsung Health instead of Google Fit — and admittedly, Samsung Health isn't worse than Google Fit, it just interfaces with fewer things — but the real insult to injury is that you're stuck with Bixby instead of Google Assistant.

If you actually use an AI assistant, chances are you only use one — they take time to train and get everything connected to them — and between Google Assistant and Bixby, Assistant is the hands-down winner. Even on Samsung phones, a vast majority of users completely disable Bixby to use Google Assistant for its wider platform compatibility, more comprehensive service integration, and more consistent performance. While it's not hard to pull out your phone and use Assistant there, being able to fire off a quick "what's the weather like?" or "did the Magic win last night so I can get cheap pizza?" on your wrist while walking around is a luxury your $200 watch should have.

The app and service selection is only part of the incentive to switch, honestly. Wear OS actually does notifications better than Tizen and Fitbit combined. Rather than every single notification needing its own page to the left of the watch face, Wear OS puts them all in a compact, collapsible list, making it easy to scan through multiple notifications and swipe ones away without looking like you're using Tindr on your wrist.

Wear OS could use a little extra polish, but if Samsung knows how to gussy up Android and give it a consistent and consistently good look on Galaxy phones and the Galaxy Tab series of tablets. If Samsung gives Wear OS the One UI treatment — the same way Oppo did a Color OS flair to the Oppo Watch — that could make the Galaxy Watch Active 3 the best of all possible worlds:

  • A well-designed, compact watch with a bright screen
  • Wear OS app selection with Samsung polish
  • Google Assistant on a watch that's actually fast

Making this jump with the more affordable Watch Active line also makes sense for testing the waters. The Galaxy Watch Active 2 is still a great device over a year later, and the best Samsung smartwatch the Galaxy Watch 3 likely won't see a sequel until 2022. That's plenty of time to see whether or not a Wear OS-powered Galaxy Watch Active 3 runs the table.

Of course, this may very well be wishful thinking. I am nothing if not a hopeless dreamer. If this is real, though, if Samsung and Google come together to make this tiny bundle of joy while that Google/Fitbit watch is still in regulatory limbo, it will be an insta-buy for me with my own money. Give it Google Pay, adaptive brightness, and my Google Keep shopping list on my wrist while I'm weaving through Target, and I will give you $250 for it, easy.

Please. Give me hope for a perfect small smartwatch.

Source: androidcentral

Popular posts from this blog

Apple and Meta Reportedly Discussed AI Partnership for iOS 18

Apple has held discussions with Meta about integrating the Facebook owner's AI model into iOS 18 as part of its Apple Intelligence feature set, according to a report over the weekend. Meta launched Llama 2, its large language model, in July 2023, and in April, the company released the latest versions of its AI models, called Llama 3 . The Wall Street Journal reports that the two longtime rivals have held talks about offering Meta's model as an additional option to OpenAI's ChatGPT. The paywalled report notes that the discussions haven't been finalized and could fall through. As part of Apple Intelligence, Apple has announced a partnership with OpenAI that will allow Siri to access ChatGPT directly in iOS 18, iPadOS 18, and macOS Sequoia to provide better responses in relevant situations. Using ChatGPT will be optional, so users with concerns about the technology can abstain and still make use of Apple's own new AI features. Speaking at WWDC 2024, Apple's

Apple Wasn't Interested in AI Partnership With Meta Due to Privacy Concerns

Apple turned down an AI partnership with Facebook parent company Meta due to privacy concerns, according to a report from Bloomberg . Meta and Apple had a brief discussion about a possible partnership in March, but the talks did not progress and Apple does not plan to integrate Meta's large language model (LLM) into iOS. Over the weekend, The Wall Street Journal suggested that Apple and Meta were in active discussions about integrating Llama, Facebook's LLM, into iOS 18 as part of Apple Intelligence. The report suggested that the discussions were ongoing had not been finalized, but Bloomberg 's follow-up indicates Apple never seriously considered a partnership. Preliminary talks happened at the same time that Apple began discussions with OpenAI and Google parent company Alphabet, but Apple decided not to move on to a more formal discussion because "it doesn't see that company's privacy practices as stringent enough." Apple did end up signing a d

iPhone 13 Pro vs. iPhone 16 Pro: 60+ Upgrades to Expect

The iPhone 16 Pro is set to succeed 2023's iPhone 15 Pro , introducing over 25 new features and improvements to Apple's high-end smartphones. With many users adopting three-year upgrade cycles, plenty of iPhone 13 Pro owners will be looking to upgrade to the ‌iPhone 16 Pro‌ later this year, so this guide breaks down every major difference you should be aware of between the two generations based on rumors. The ‌‌iPhone 13‌‌ Pro debuted in 2021, introducing a brighter display with ProMotion technology for refresh rates up to 120Hz, the A15 Bionic chip, a telephoto camera with 3x optical zoom, macro photography and photographic styles, Cinematic mode for recording videos with shallow depth of field, ProRes video recording, a 1TB storage option, and up to five hours of additional battery life. Three years later, the ‌iPhone 16 Pro‌ is expected to offer over 60 upgrades. All of the changes the ‌iPhone 16 Pro‌ models are expected to feature compared to their 2021 predecessors

Here Are the macOS Sequoia Features Intel Macs Won't Support

When Apple released macOS Monterey in 2021, some key features required a Mac with Apple silicon. The same scenario played out with macOS Ventura in 2022, and then again the following year with the release of macOS Sonoma. With macOS Sequoia set to arrive in the fall, which new features can Intel Mac owners expect to be unavailable to them this time around? Apple says that macOS Sequoia is compatible with the same Macs as macOS Sonoma, but Apple's fine print reveals that certain new features won't work on Intel machines. If you're still on an Intel Mac, here's what you won't have access to. Apple Intelligence Apple Intelligence , a deeply integrated, personalized AI feature set for Apple devices that uses cutting-edge generative artificial intelligence to enhance the user experience, won't be available on Intel Macs. Apple says the advanced features require its M1 chip or later, so if your Mac was released before November 2020, you're out of luck. T