Skip to main content

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3: how deep are your pockets?

Samsung really aced it with its latest foldable phones, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. They’re two of the best foldable phones we’ve ever seen, and they’re certainly the most popular.

But which Galaxy Z phone is the better buy? Is a straight comparison even valid, or are they completely different phones with completely different use-case scenarios?

Having spent quality time with both foldable flagships, that’s what we’re here to find out. Let’s break down where these bendy phones differ, where they’re similar, and which is the best for you.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3: price and availability

Both of these phones arrived in UK and US shops on August 27, 2021. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is by far the more expensive of the two, with prices starting from $1,799 / £1,599 / AU$2,499 for the 256GB model. If you want more storage, $1,899 / £1,699 / AU$2,649 will get you 512GB.

Pricing for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 starts from $999 / £949 / AU$1,499 for 128GB, while the 256GB model costs $1,049 / £999 / AU$1,599. This makes it the first truly accessible (though hardly cheap) foldable phone that Samsung has made.

As you can see, while these Samsung foldables are of the same broad class and vintage, there’s a huge difference in pricing. Before you even consider their relative merits, it’s worth considering your budget.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 review

A Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 (Image credit: Aakash Jhaveri

view at amazon


While both of these Galaxy Z foldables get the ‘Galaxy Z 3’ moniker, only the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a genuine third-generation device. There was no Galaxy Z Flip 2, just a Galaxy Z Flip and an incrementally improved Galaxy Z Flip 5G.

Still, Samsung has taken what it’s learned from across the Galaxy Z range and produced two remarkably solid foldable phones. Both have very solid and smooth hinge mechanisms and IPX8 ratings, meaning they’re the first Samsung foldables to be properly water resistant.

Both phones use premium materials, with Gorilla Glass Victus to the exterior, tough plastic to the inner screens (that’s the price of a foldable screen), and tough aluminum frames.

Aside from the obvious fact that both phones fold in half, that’s about where the design similarities end. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is essentially a tablet that folds down into a full-sized phone, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a full-sized phone that folds down into a compact pager of sorts.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3

A Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 (Image credit: Future)

view at amazon

To that end, the Z Fold 3 dwarfs the Z Flip 3. The larger phone is a massive (and rather square) 158.2 x 128.1 x 6.4mm when unfurled, while the smaller phone is a more traditional (but still very skinny) 166 x 72.2 x 6.9mm.

If that doesn’t paint a picture for you, consider how much both phones weigh. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is downright cumbersome at 271g, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 weighs about as much as your average non-foldable phone at 183g.

The difference is as stark as this: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is arguably the most pocketable flagship phone on the market, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is arguably the least pocketable.

Another fundamental difference is how the two phones function when closed. Without wishing to step on the toes of the following section, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 works like a normal phone when closed, while the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is only really functional when open.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 review

A Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 (Image credit: Aakash Jhaveri)


Both phones pack two displays: one large screen that covers almost the entirety of the inside surface, and another smaller display that sits on one external surface.

In the case of the Galaxy Z Fold 3, that external element is a huge 7.6-inch Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with a 1768 x 2208 resolution. With the Galaxy Z Flip 3, it’s a 6.7-inch Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with a 1080 x 2640 resolution.

Both screens can hit the heady heights of a 120Hz refresh rate, which makes them super-smooth to operate. Both can hit a peak brightness of 1200 nits, too.

Aside from size, the biggest difference here is one of aspect ratio. While the Galaxy Z Flip 3 folds out to a fairly typical 22:9, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 folds out to an atypical (for phones at least) 22.5:18. This makes the larger display almost square, resulting in a tablet-like canvas.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3

A Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 (Image credit: Future)

This is ideal for viewing web content and editing documents, but is perhaps a little sub-optimal for landscape video content. The picture will still be plenty large enough, but you’ll have to put up with large black borders.

In terms of the external displays, it’s the Galaxy Z Flip 3 that’s the weird one here. Its 1.9-inch AMOLED, with its 260 x 512 resolution, is rather weedy, and useful only for showing the time, date, brief notification previews, and a handful of widgets.

Conversely, the Galaxy Z Fold 3’s external display is a 6.2-inch 2268 x 832 Dynamic AMOLED 2X with a 25:9 aspect ratio and a 120Hz refresh rate. In other words, it’s a pretty normal smartphone display, and as such, is useful for all normal smartphone tasks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 review

A Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 (Image credit: Aakash Jhaveri)


Let’s not beat around the bush here: cameras are not the strong suit of either of Samsung’s latest foldable phones. It’s where the clearest compromises have been made compared to their non-foldable stablemates.

We described the Fold 3’s cameras as “good, but not groundbreaking”, while we said that the Flip 3’s cameras represented “the phone’s biggest shortcoming”. Neither system is bad, per se, but you can do a lot better for the money if you’re willing to forego those flashy foldable designs.

That said, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 camera system is quite clearly the better of the two. It’s a triple–12MP set-up with wide, ultra-wide, and telephoto options, so it covers all of the key bases. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a dual–12MP camera set-up with wide and ultra-wide options. There is no telephoto.

What’s more, the Galaxy Z Fold 3’s main sensor is a 1/1.76“ unit, which is larger than the Galaxy Z Flip 3’s 1/2.55” equivalent. This means that it can hoover up more light, which is generally a good thing in mobile photography – especially when those ambient light levels start to drop.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3

A Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 (Image credit: Future)

Both cameras are capable of taking bright, punchy shots in most conditions, thanks largely to Samsung’s enthusiastic color science. But they’re nowhere near the level of their non-foldable $1000/£1000 competitors – including the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra.

The Fold 3’s camera system does at least offer something slightly interesting in the shape of an under-display selfie camera. But the image quality from this humble 4MP sensor really isn’t up to much. Thankfully there’s a traditional 10MP selfie camera on the outside display, which is better.

Indeed, this seems to be the same 10MP selfie cam that’s on the inside of the Galaxy Z Flip 3.

In both cases, our recommendation would be to use the main camera and the external display as a viewfinder for a level of selfie shot that no ‘normal’ phone can match.

Specs and performance

Both phones pack Snapdragon 888 chipsets, with 12GB of RAM for the Fold 3 and 8GB for the Flip 3.

This distinguishes them from other, non-foldable Samsung flagships, which tend to split their hardware between Qualcomm and home-brewed Exynos silicon. Given that Qualcomm’s chips are invariably better, this is a good thing.

Of course, even the Snapdragon 888 is no longer the fastest Android chip around, having been superseded by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. This is somewhat problematic, given that the Samsung Galaxy S22 is now out and powered by the latter chip, but for significantly less money than even the Galaxy Z Flip 3.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 review

A Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 (Image credit: Aakash Jhaveri)

Our advice would be to not pay too much attention to this performance difference. The truth is that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 doesn’t represent a huge advance, and the Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Flip 3 both continue to handle like a dream.

In terms of storage, the Fold 3 gives you a choice of 256GB or 512GB, while the Flip 3 gives you 128GB or 256GB.

Only the Galaxy Z Fold 3 features S Pen compatibility, though you’ll have to buy one of two specific styluses specifically for the task. You can thank that soft plastic screen for this stipulation.

Once you do buy the S Pen, though, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 turns into a dream phone for artists, note takers, and habitual scribblers.


The Galaxy Z Fold 3’s battery is pretty small for its size. At a mere 4,400mAh, it falls well short of most flagship phones, which of course only tend to have a single, smaller display to drive.

It’s not the only Samsung foldable to have a slightly poky battery either. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 runs on a tiny 3,300mAh cell.

This drop in battery size has negative ramifications for the stamina of both phones. With the Galaxy Z Fold 3, we found that liberal use of taxing elements like 5G and the camera would leave us high and dry before the end of a full day of usage. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 was similar.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3

A Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 (Image credit: Future)

To be clear, they can both last a day of light to moderate usage, but no more.

In terms of recharging, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 only supports up to 25W wired charging, which isn’t too hot. It’s a lot better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3’s 15W, though, which is extremely slow for a flagship phone.

Neither phone impresses in the wireless charging stakes either. The Fold 3 supports 11W, while the Flip 3 supports a mere 10W.


Besides the obvious similarities, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Flip 3 are two very different phones with very different use cases. This makes this less of a straight comparison piece than it is an exercise in establishing which phone is right for you.

The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is for those looking for a full tablet-like, large-screen experience that can still be lugged around in a pocket. Its square fold-out 7.6-inch display makes it a great canvas for web browsing, document editing, multi-tasking, and other such power-user applications.

On the other hand, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is ideal for those who want the ultimate portability without sacrificing a ‘normal’ smartphone experience. You’re still getting a strong 6.7-inch display with all the bells and whistles, but it can be folded up into a tiny square when not in use.

We called the Galaxy Z Fold 3 “The best foldable phone so far”, but it’s also very expensive and rather unwieldy. Ultimately, the winner here comes down to the size of your pockets, in both senses of the term.

Popular posts from this blog

Yandex spins out self-driving car unit from its Uber JV, invests $150M into newco

Self-driving cars are still many years away from becoming a ubiquitous reality, but today one of the bigger efforts to build and develop them is taking a significant step out as part of its strategy to be at the forefront for when they do. Yandex — the publicly-traded Russian tech giant that started as a search engine but has expanded into a number of other, related areas (similar to US counterpart Google) — today announced that it is spinning out its self-driving car unit from MLU BV — a ride-hailing and food delivery joint venture it operates in partnership with Uber. The move comes amid reports that Yandex and Uber were eyeing up an IPO for MLU  last year. At the time, the JV was estimated to be valued at around $7.7 billion. It’s not clear how those plans will have been impacted in recent months, with COVID-19 putting huge pressure on ride-hailing and food-delivery businesses globally, and IPOs generally down compared to a year ago. In that context, spinning out the unit could

Slack’s new integration deal with AWS could also be about tweaking Microsoft

Slack and Amazon announced a big integration late yesterday afternoon. As part of the deal, Slack will use Amazon Chime for its call feature, while reiterating its commitment to use AWS as its preferred cloud provider to run its infrastructure. At the same time, AWS has agreed to use Slack for internal communications. Make no mistake, this is a big deal as the SaaS communications tool increases its ties with AWS, but this agreement could also be about slighting Microsoft and its rival Teams product by making a deal with a cloud rival. In the past Slack CEO Stewart Butterfield has had choice words for Microsoft saying the Redmond technology giant sees his company as an “existential threat.” Whether that’s true or not — Teams is but one piece of a huge technology company — it’s impossible not to look at the deal in this context. Aligning more deeply with AWS sends a message to Microsoft, whose Azure infrastructure services compete with AWS. Butterfield didn’t say that of course

Xbox One S vs. Xbox One X: Which should you buy? We live and breathe tech, and also gaming, with every member of Windows Central rocking either an Xbox One console or PC gaming rig. We've compared and contrasted every iteration of Xbox One to bring you this guide. Xbox One X Raw 4K power From $299 at Amazon Pros Has thousands of games 4K media apps, Blu-ray discs, and games IR blaster for TV controls, Amazon Echo for voice controls Improved HDD speeds for faster loading times Cons More expensive at around $500 RRP Requires a 4K TV to get the most out of it The Xbox One X is the world's most powerful games console, running the latest games with the crispest, detailed visuals on TV sets with 4K HDR support. Xbox One S More affordable From $226 at Amazon Pros Has thousands of games 4K media apps and Blu-ray IR blaster for TV controls, Amazon Echo for voice controls More affordable at around $300 RRP Cons No 4K games Games run worse, even on a 1080p TV The Xbox One S i

Elon Musk sends yet another notice trying to terminate the Twitter deal

Kristen Radtke / The Verge; Getty Images Elon Musk has sent a third letter to Twitter attempting to terminate his $44 billion acquisition of the company . Musk’s legal team cited Twitter’s multimillion dollar severance payment to former security chief and whistleblower Peiter Zatko as a violation of the merger agreement and a reason to end the deal. The letter, dated September 9th, was sent to Twitter’s chief legal officer Vijaya Gadde, and was included in a filing Twitter made with the SEC on Friday (which you can read at the bottom of this article). Last month, Zatko made headlines by accusing Twitter of misleading investors about the number of bots on the service, failing to delete users’ data, and having poor security practices, among other things. Musk jumped on the accusations, citing them in his second termination letter and subpoenaing Zatko to testify in the lawsuit. Zatko was set to be deposed on Friday. Elon Musk sent his first letter of termination in July , say