Skip to main content

Sheryl Sandberg on leaving Meta

Kristen Radtke / The Verge; Getty Images

“It is a job that’s been an honor and a privilege, but it’s not a job that leaves a lot of time to do much else.”

When, not if, Sheryl Sandberg leaves Meta has been one of the most speculated questions among current and former employees over the past few years. Even still, the news Wednesday that she will soon leave her position as the social media giant’s number-two executive sent shockwaves throughout the company and the rest of Silicon Valley.

In her own words, there are two big factors in Sandberg’s decision to leave now: the fact that Meta’s executive team has been built up to make way for her departure, and that, as the leader of the “Lean In” movement, she wants to focus more on philanthropy and women’s rights. “There’s no perfect time,” she told me during a brief phone interview Wednesday afternoon. “It is a job that’s been an honor and a privilege, but it’s not a job that leaves a lot of time to do much else.”

Here’s my full conversation with Sandberg about her stepping down as COO of Meta, edited lightly for clarity:

Why the timing of doing this now versus at any other point?

You know, when I took this job, I remember interviewing with Mark for a very long time and then going to dinner with Mark and Priscilla and [my late husband] Dave, and talking to Dave about how I should only take this job if I thought I could do it for five years. And that was 14 years ago. 14 years into a job I thought would last for five years.

There’s no perfect time. It is a job that’s been an honor and a privilege, but it’s not a job that leaves a lot of time to do much else. And I really wanted to make more room in my life to do philanthropy, to work with my foundation. It’s a very critical moment for women, and it’s very important to me and to have the opportunity to do more on that right now. It also is a moment where I really feel very, very good about the team we’ve built. Very good. I think Mark and I have built an incredibly strong team.

So was it just getting the team to a place where it felt good to be able to make this move?

Yeah, that’s a big part of it because I care so much about the company.

You’re going to stay on the board, so you’re going to continue to be engaged there. Do you plan on staying for multiple years?

I haven’t gotten that far but for now, staying on the board.

The business has always had challenges, but I would say it’s probably the most multifaceted it has ever been in terms of regulation, Apple’s tracking changes, and all these things that are happening at once. How do you feel about leaving in this moment, where there’s a huge transition underway with how ads work and everything you built?

When you think about our business, there’s never one moment where a chapter ends and a new one begins. This is not the beginning or the end of the ads, this isn’t the beginning or the end of the metaverse business. But it’s a continuum. And we’ve had challenges all along the way. We’re going to continue to have challenges going forward. The task ahead is to build the current business, which people are working on and doing, and also build the future. And I have a lot of confidence in both.

I said on the earnings call that we have a family of apps that 3 billion people use to connect. Businesses use that to grow their business and I think that can and will continue. And then when you think about the metaverse, our leader there is Boz [Andrew Bosworth]. And Boz was my partner on the ads business for a very long time. He is very business minded and I think will do a great job building the next business for the company.

What do you make of the metaverse in terms of the business bet there? It’s very long term, obviously. But how have you thought about that?

The opportunity and the challenge is the same. This is a company that has to build the next business while it’s running its current one. It’s a reflective moment for me, a time when I look back over the course of the last 14 years and see we have done that before, right? If you remember, we went public with no ads. No ads! No ads on mobile at all. And that mobile transition happened very quickly. We only had ads on the desktop, so we had to run the desktop business while migrating on to mobile. I think this is going to be an even bigger transition than that, but this is a team that knows how to make transitions like that.

Do you have a biggest regret, looking back over 14 years?

We have things we’ve learned and certainly wish we had known earlier. I put in my post that we have a real responsibility to protect peoples’ privacy, to build safety into the products. And I think we made those investments. But of course we wish we had done those earlier. And if you look at what we’re doing now with the metaverse, Nick [Clegg, Meta’s president of global affairs] wrote a very good paper, and we are building that in now for the metaverse. And I think that is very, very, very important.

Source: The Verge

Popular posts from this blog

Twitter has hidden the chronological feed on iOS again – and I'm furious

In a controversial move, Twitter has brought back a feature that removes the 'Latest Tweets' view for users on iOS, which is something that many users, including me, hated back in March 2022 – and it's now rolling out. The first time the company decided to do this, 'Home' would appear first in a tab at the top, and there was no way of changing it so that 'Latest Tweets' would be the default view. It was reverted back after the company said it was a 'bug' for iOS users. This time though, it's no bug. Instead, it's 'For You' and 'Following' where you can only swipe between them now, which doesn't make much sense for a platform where you're using the platform to keep up to date with who you follow. It's a bizarre change that makes me ask – who wants this, especially during a time when its new owner, Elon Musk, is bringing in and reversing changes almost every week still? This one change will have big consequenc

Port of Lisbon hit by ransomware attack

One of Europe’s busiest seaports, the Port of Lisbon, has been hit with a ransomware attack that knocked some of its digital systems offline. "All safety protocols and response measures provided for this type of occurrence were quickly activated, the situation being monitored by the National Cybersecurity Center and the Judicial Police," a statement shared by the Port of Lisbon Administration (APL) with local media earlier this week said. The incident failed to impact the port’s operations, but did take its official website,, offline. LockBit taking responsibility "The Port of Lisbon Administration is working permanently and closely with all competent entities in order to guarantee the security of the systems and respective data," the statement concludes. While the company doesn’t explicitly say it was targeted with ransomware, the LockBit ransomware operator has added APL to its leaks website, taking responsibility for the hit.  The databas

This new Linux malware floods machines with cryptominers and DDoS bots

Cybersecurity researchers have spotted a new Linux malware downloader that targets poorly defended Linux servers with cryptocurrency miners and DDoS IRC bots. Researchers from ASEC discovered the attack after the Shell Script Compiler (SHC) used to create the downloader was uploaded to VirusTotal. Apparently, Korean users were the ones uploading the SHC, and it’s Korean users who are targets, as well. Further analysis has shown that the threat actors are going after poorly defended Linux servers, brute-forcing their way into administrator accounts over SSH.  Mining Monero Once they make their way in, they’ll either install a cryptocurrency miner, or a DDoS IRC bot. The miner being deployed is XMRig, arguably the most popular cryptocurrency miner among hackers. It uses the computing power of a victim's endpoints to generate Monero, a privacy-oriented cryptocurrency whose transactions are seemingly impossible to track, and whose users are allegedly impossible to identify. Fo

Code-generating tools could be more of a security hindrance than help

New research by a group of Stanford-affiliated researchers has uncovered that code-generating AI tools such as Github Copilot can present more security risks than many users may realize. The study looked specifically at Codex, a product of OpenAI, of which Elon Musk is among the co-founders.  Codex powers the Microsoft-owned GitHub Copilot platform, which is designed to make coding easier and more accessible by translating natural language into code and suggesting changes based on contextual evidence. AI-coding problems Lead co-author of the study, Neil Perry, explains that “code-generating systems are currently not a replacement for human developers”. The study asked 47 developers of differing abilities to use Codex for security-related problems, using Python, JavaScript and C programming languages. It concluded that the participants who relied on Codex were more likely to write insecure code compared with a control group. Read more > These are the best laptops for progr