Skip to main content

Google defends divisive attempts to replace tracking cookies

Google has moved to clarify its approach to developing new technologies to replace third-party tracking cookies, an effort designed to inject a greater level of privacy into the digital advertising chain.

At a press event attended by TechRadar Pro, Google’s President for EMEA, Matt Brittin, fielded questions on the trajectory of the Privacy Sandbox project and the criticisms levelled by privacy advocates.

“Users want a web that’s private and safe; we can see that in our search results. But if you want this whole thing to work, you need advertising that works, because a subscription model for the web doesn’t deliver for everyone,” he said.

“It’s really about how to build a web that works for everyone. What we’re doing is trying to ensure you can have privacy-safe, high-performance advertising that works for the user and the advertiser - and we’re optimistic about that.”

FLoC, Topics and Android

Google first launched the Privacy Sandbox initiative in 2019, in recognition of the fact that the system underpinning its lucrative advertising business (powered by third-party cookies that track people across the web) creates opportunities for invasions of privacy.

“Like any technology, cookies are neither good nor bad. It’s just how they are being used,” said Brittin. “The reason we need to move away from them is that they are increasingly being used in ways that are infuriating for consumers.”

The goal is to develop a collection of new systems and technologies that fulfil the same role as cookies, allowing advertisers to target netizens most likely to engage with their products, but without compromising user privacy to the same degree.

Thus far, achieving this objective has proven as difficult as it sounds. The first proposal, FLoC, was widely panned by privacy advocates, who dismissed the system as a sleight of hand.

In January, Google announced it would substitute FLoC for a similar system called Topics, which offers a way to serve up ads based on broad interest categories. The system relies on three weeks’ worth of browsing data, stored locally on-device, to place people into a variety of different buckets, which in turn determine what types of ads the person will receive. Web users can opt out of any particular “topic” at any time via their web browser.

Google Ads

Google's advertising business accounts for roughly 80% of the company's revenue. Last quarter, advertising brought in $40.7bn. (Image credit: Shutterstock / Primakov)

Despite continued criticism, Topics appears to be the system Google will continue to pursue as it moves ahead with plans to leave third-party cookies behind. At the current moment, Topics is undergoing a trial, alongside a number of separate APIs developed under the Privacy Sandbox initiative.

Google also recently announced it will extend Privacy Sandbox to Android, phasing out advertising ID (a tracking system analogous to third-party cookies) in favor of alternatives that limit the sharing of user data with third-parties and do not rely on cross-app tracking.

The deadline for the eradication of cookies was recently pushed back to the second half of 2024, to afford industry stakeholders additional time to prepare, and a similar date has been set for the move away from advertising ID on Android.

The free and open web

The typical riposte from Google to criticism of its efforts has been that targeted advertising is crucial to preserving the free and open web. Without the ability to target ads effectively, content and services currently available for free would have to be pay-gated to remain economically viable for the provider, the argument goes.

In response to questions from TechRadar Pro about criticism from privacy advocates, some of whom are calling on regulators to ban targeted advertising outright, Brittin pursued a similar line of reasoning, citing figures from the IAB that suggest such a ban move would wipe up to $39 billion from the publishing market.

“If you want a web that’s affordable, advertisers need to reach users. If you want no advertising, that’s the world of ad blockers and companies that develop technologies that allow people to block everything, but that’s a sledgehammer that destroys the funding model of original content,” he said.

“An objection to advertising that’s relevant is different from an objection to personal data being used in ways people haven’t consented to - and here’s where we would defend our approach very robustly. We’re trying to give consumers the protection they want, as well as advertising that is helpful and relevant.”

web browsers

(Image credit: Softulka / Shutterstock)

Brittin, who worked in publishing before joining Google, did concede that new monetization models may emerge that would allow publishers to fund their content without relying on targeted advertising. For example, under a micropayments-based system, users would pay small sums for each piece of content they access, instead of expensive subscriptions that serve to exclude people from the information market. But there are problems with this premise too, he noted.

“Micro payments is something that hasn’t really taken off on the web. The challenge for publishers there is that they are currently monetizing an audience in aggregate, but if [stories are each earning a few cents per view], what’s the incentive for journalists to work under the umbrella of a publication? You’ll end up with the further atomization of news,” said Brittin.

Asked whether Google would consider switching from targeted to contextual advertising in the name of privacy, if a robust new model for monetization were to emerge, Brittin refused to be drawn.

“Let’s see if we get that technology,” he told TechRadar Pro. “[In a few years’ time], I’d hope we’re looking at a web that’s open and affordable, enjoyed by almost everyone on the planet, and that we see businesses able to grow more and more through advertising that is privacy-safe.”

Source: TechRadar

Popular posts from this blog

The hidden cost of food delivery

Noah Lichtenstein Contributor Share on Twitter Noah Lichtenstein is the founder and managing partner of Crossover , a diversified private technology fund backed by institutional investors, technology execs and professional athletes and entertainers. More posts by this contributor What Studying Students Teaches Us About Great Apps I’ll admit it: When it comes to food, I’m lazy. There are dozens of great dining options within a few blocks of my home, yet I still end up ordering food through delivery apps four or five times per week. With the growing coronavirus pandemic closing restaurants and consumers self-isolating, it is likely we will see a spike in food delivery much like the 20% jump China reported during the peak of its crisis. With the food delivery sector rocketing toward a projected $365 billion by the end of the decade, I’m clearly not the only one turning to delivery apps even before the pandemic hit. Thanks to technology (and VC funding) we can get a ri

Cyber Monday Canada: Last-minute deals for everyone on your list

Best Cyber Monday Canada deals: Smart Home Audio Phones, Tablets & Accessories Wearables Laptops & PC Components Amazon products Gaming Televisions Cameras Lifestyle & Kitchen Toys & Kids Cyber Monday Canada is here, and retailers are rolling out the red carpet for customers who want to shop for everything from tech to kitchenware to games and everything in between. Unlike years past, Cyber Monday Canada deals look a bit different than normal. Instead of retailers trying to pack their stores with as many shoppers as possible, we're seeing tons of online deals that you can take advantage of from the comfort of your home. We've rounded up our favorites below, so feel free to browse through the best of what Canada Cyber Monday has to offer! This list is being updated with new Cyber Monday deals all the time, so check back often. Spotlight deals It's a Switch Nintendo Switch Fortnite Edition bundle $399.95 at Amazon It's a Switch.

Peloton Reverses Course, Will Continue to Support Apple GymKit

Earlier this week, Peloton said that it would drop support for Apple's GymKit feature that syncs data to the Health app. Customers were unhappy with the decision and complained to the company, leading Peloton to announce a change in plans. Peloton on Thursday said that after listening to member feedback on GymKit, the integration will continue to be offered. Peloton wanted to stop offering GymKit integration in favor of the Peloton One-Tap tracking feature, but GymKit has been a key feature on the $2,500 Bike+ since its 2020 debut , and other Peloton machines since 2022. After listening to Members’ feedback about discontinuing Apple GymKit integration for Bike+, we have decided to continue offering Apple GymKit integration. As a Member-first company, we are always grateful to our Members for sharing their views. — Peloton (@onepeloton) February 16, 2024 The One-Tap tracking app does monitor distance, pace, and heart rate metrics, but only basic information is synced t

Slack’s new integration deal with AWS could also be about tweaking Microsoft

Slack and Amazon announced a big integration late yesterday afternoon. As part of the deal, Slack will use Amazon Chime for its call feature, while reiterating its commitment to use AWS as its preferred cloud provider to run its infrastructure. At the same time, AWS has agreed to use Slack for internal communications. Make no mistake, this is a big deal as the SaaS communications tool increases its ties with AWS, but this agreement could also be about slighting Microsoft and its rival Teams product by making a deal with a cloud rival. In the past Slack CEO Stewart Butterfield has had choice words for Microsoft saying the Redmond technology giant sees his company as an “existential threat.” Whether that’s true or not — Teams is but one piece of a huge technology company — it’s impossible not to look at the deal in this context. Aligning more deeply with AWS sends a message to Microsoft, whose Azure infrastructure services compete with AWS. Butterfield didn’t say that of course