Skip to main content

Support for Witcher game ending with an "unconventional solution"

Even supernatural monster-slayers need a day off. The Witcher 3 sees Geralt and Roach spending a lot of time slashing their way through the Continent, but no matter where their adventures take them, there always seems to be a warm and welcoming place to hang up your boots, receive some stony glares from the locals, and get stuck into a game of Gwent.

Building your deck and collecting new cards is such a popular in-game activity in one of the best RPGs ever that CD Projekt RED created a dedicated spin-off in Gwent: The Witcher Card Game. 

“The cards that will be released in 2023 will be the last brand new ones to be added to the card pool," game director Vlad Tortsov said in a 2023 roadmap video. “It’s a pretty significant change.”

But this isn’t the end of the game.

Greener pastures

“We are not planning to release new cards, starting from 2024,” Tortsov said. “We are basically planning to close the card pool [in 2023] with every idea that we wanted to add, and every mechanic that we want to see.” This would also include an end to the dev’s input when it comes to continued balance changes that have been a part of their structured updates.

“We believe that this existing card pool can be improved in terms of viability of the meta, [so] there is no need to introduce rotation anymore. With this fixed number of cards within Gwent, we will do our best to make sure it’s in a good state meta-wise.”

When asked if this meant that Gwent, as a game, would be put in the freezer, Tortsovimmediately dispelled this notion. 

The team’s “unconventional solution” to maintaining the game after they step back is to put the future of the meta in the knowledgeable hands of its players.

Geralt and Ciri stare each other down in Gwent: The Witcher Card Game

(Image credit: CD Projekt RED)

 World in your hands 

“We want to give the Gwent community the right tools and opportunities to drive the balance changes of the game going forward.”

This means that players, regardless of their game development or coding background, will be able to make changes to the cards through the Gwent client itself. These may not be as robust as the CD Projekt RED dev changes, but when it comes to maintaining balance in the meta, they will ensure that “Players can interact with the game not just by playing it but also by deciding which direction it will go in,” from card nerfs to buffs and more.

Although this might sound daunting to many,  CD Projekt RED senior communications officer Pawel Burza seems certain that it is the right decision. Since all changes would come from within, players will likely know the best reworks that would benefit themselves as well as the rest of their community.

“We [as developers] are looking at it from above,” he says, “But when it comes to players who are playing the game [they will have a level of] personal engagement that causes you to favor or disfavor certain archetypes.”

Roach stands atop a house, his natural habitat.

(Image credit: CD Projekt Red)

Tortsov and Burza have been “partially inspired” by games that give their player-base a greater sense of control. “Games that are sticking are those that are driven by the community,” they agree.

CD Projekt Red won’t be taking any time off by relinquishing control of Gwent, though. It seems to be clearing its plate to focus on five new projects that have been announced this year, including a reboot of The Witcher and a sequel to Cyberpunk 2077. One of the games also set in The Witcher’s universe will involve multiplayer elements and worlds within worlds – more than enough for the team to be getting on with once they round off the Gwent card pool. 

Of course, the card team could be working on more card game projects, too. Presumably, The Witcher 4 will have its own version of Gwent, after all.

Having released in 2017, next year will mark six years of Gwent: The Witcher Card Game. It makes sense that CD Projekt Red will want to safeguard the game's established community whilst leaving space for something even more exciting on the not-too-distant horizon.



Source: TechRadar

Popular posts from this blog

Code-generating tools could be more of a security hindrance than help

New research by a group of Stanford-affiliated researchers has uncovered that code-generating AI tools such as Github Copilot can present more security risks than many users may realize. The study looked specifically at Codex, a product of OpenAI, of which Elon Musk is among the co-founders.  Codex powers the Microsoft-owned GitHub Copilot platform, which is designed to make coding easier and more accessible by translating natural language into code and suggesting changes based on contextual evidence. AI-coding problems Lead co-author of the study, Neil Perry, explains that “code-generating systems are currently not a replacement for human developers”. The study asked 47 developers of differing abilities to use Codex for security-related problems, using Python, JavaScript and C programming languages. It concluded that the participants who relied on Codex were more likely to write insecure code compared with a control group. Read more > These are the best laptops for progr

Port of Lisbon hit by ransomware attack

One of Europe’s busiest seaports, the Port of Lisbon, has been hit with a ransomware attack that knocked some of its digital systems offline. "All safety protocols and response measures provided for this type of occurrence were quickly activated, the situation being monitored by the National Cybersecurity Center and the Judicial Police," a statement shared by the Port of Lisbon Administration (APL) with local media earlier this week said. The incident failed to impact the port’s operations, but did take its official website, portodelisboa.pt, offline. LockBit taking responsibility "The Port of Lisbon Administration is working permanently and closely with all competent entities in order to guarantee the security of the systems and respective data," the statement concludes. While the company doesn’t explicitly say it was targeted with ransomware, the LockBit ransomware operator has added APL to its leaks website, taking responsibility for the hit.  The databas

This new Linux malware floods machines with cryptominers and DDoS bots

Cybersecurity researchers have spotted a new Linux malware downloader that targets poorly defended Linux servers with cryptocurrency miners and DDoS IRC bots. Researchers from ASEC discovered the attack after the Shell Script Compiler (SHC) used to create the downloader was uploaded to VirusTotal. Apparently, Korean users were the ones uploading the SHC, and it’s Korean users who are targets, as well. Further analysis has shown that the threat actors are going after poorly defended Linux servers, brute-forcing their way into administrator accounts over SSH.  Mining Monero Once they make their way in, they’ll either install a cryptocurrency miner, or a DDoS IRC bot. The miner being deployed is XMRig, arguably the most popular cryptocurrency miner among hackers. It uses the computing power of a victim's endpoints to generate Monero, a privacy-oriented cryptocurrency whose transactions are seemingly impossible to track, and whose users are allegedly impossible to identify. Fo

Twitter has hidden the chronological feed on iOS again – and I'm furious

In a controversial move, Twitter has brought back a feature that removes the 'Latest Tweets' view for users on iOS, which is something that many users, including me, hated back in March 2022 – and it's now rolling out. The first time the company decided to do this, 'Home' would appear first in a tab at the top, and there was no way of changing it so that 'Latest Tweets' would be the default view. It was reverted back after the company said it was a 'bug' for iOS users. This time though, it's no bug. Instead, it's 'For You' and 'Following' where you can only swipe between them now, which doesn't make much sense for a platform where you're using the platform to keep up to date with who you follow. It's a bizarre change that makes me ask – who wants this, especially during a time when its new owner, Elon Musk, is bringing in and reversing changes almost every week still? This one change will have big consequenc