Skip to main content

Twitter Blue is relaunching on Monday – here's what you need to know

It's been a somewhat tumultuous time at Twitter since Elon Musk took over at the end of October, and there's been a lot of focus on the controversial changes to the Twitter Blue subscription plan. Now Twitter has announced the plan is relaunching on Monday.

In a tweet from its official account, Twitter confirmed that the cost of Twitter Blue will remain the same at $8 a month, but go up to $11 a month if you sign up through iOS (with Apple's App Store tax included). International pricing for the iOS bump has yet to be confirmed, but the plan currently costs £7 a month in the UK and AU$7 in Australia.

One of the most talked about changes coming to Twitter Blue is that verification will be rolled into it. The new announcement says that Blue subscribers with a verified phone number will get a blue tick once their account has been approved, so it sounds like there is some kind of manual checking going on too.

See more

What you get

Twitter also says that tweets from Blue subscribers will be prioritized in replies, mentions and search. Those who pay the monthly fee will also see fewer ads and be able to post longer videos, as well as gaining early access to new features as they're testing.

Other Twitter features that are going to be exclusive to Blue subscribers are the ability to edit tweets, to post video at 1080p quality, and to access a reader mode that makes tweets and threads easier to parse on screen.

Meanwhile, the "official" labels that have appeared on some accounts will be changed to gold checkmarks for businesses and gray checkmarks for government and "multilateral" accounts. As yet it's not clear what will happen to individual users who have previously been verified under the older system.


Analysis: Twitter 2.0 takes off

As the head of SpaceX, Tesla and now Twitter, Elon Musk certainly divides opinion – but there's no debate that he likes to move fast with his changes and innovations. We've seen all kinds of tests and tweaks on Twitter in the past couple of months.

When it comes to Twitter Blue and the verification process, it could be argued that Musk has moved too fast. While Twitter Blue was already available before his arrival, offering a blue tick to subscribers while also hiking up prices for those who sign up through their iPhones or iPads has made it more confusing and more contentious.

Having extra features that cost makes sense – Twitter needs the revenue, after all – but verification was originally supposed to be a way of confirming identity and trustworthiness on Twitter. Now, that can be bought by anyone who is able to afford it, which dilutes the appeal of having that blue checkmark.

We'll have to wait and see how these changes affect the social network and whether Musk's grand plan for Twitter 2.0 can become a reality. No doubt there's plenty more in the pipeline too as the platform continues to evolve.



Source: TechRadar

Popular posts from this blog

Code-generating tools could be more of a security hindrance than help

New research by a group of Stanford-affiliated researchers has uncovered that code-generating AI tools such as Github Copilot can present more security risks than many users may realize. The study looked specifically at Codex, a product of OpenAI, of which Elon Musk is among the co-founders.  Codex powers the Microsoft-owned GitHub Copilot platform, which is designed to make coding easier and more accessible by translating natural language into code and suggesting changes based on contextual evidence. AI-coding problems Lead co-author of the study, Neil Perry, explains that “code-generating systems are currently not a replacement for human developers”. The study asked 47 developers of differing abilities to use Codex for security-related problems, using Python, JavaScript and C programming languages. It concluded that the participants who relied on Codex were more likely to write insecure code compared with a control group. Read more > These are the best laptops for progr

Port of Lisbon hit by ransomware attack

One of Europe’s busiest seaports, the Port of Lisbon, has been hit with a ransomware attack that knocked some of its digital systems offline. "All safety protocols and response measures provided for this type of occurrence were quickly activated, the situation being monitored by the National Cybersecurity Center and the Judicial Police," a statement shared by the Port of Lisbon Administration (APL) with local media earlier this week said. The incident failed to impact the port’s operations, but did take its official website, portodelisboa.pt, offline. LockBit taking responsibility "The Port of Lisbon Administration is working permanently and closely with all competent entities in order to guarantee the security of the systems and respective data," the statement concludes. While the company doesn’t explicitly say it was targeted with ransomware, the LockBit ransomware operator has added APL to its leaks website, taking responsibility for the hit.  The databas

This new Linux malware floods machines with cryptominers and DDoS bots

Cybersecurity researchers have spotted a new Linux malware downloader that targets poorly defended Linux servers with cryptocurrency miners and DDoS IRC bots. Researchers from ASEC discovered the attack after the Shell Script Compiler (SHC) used to create the downloader was uploaded to VirusTotal. Apparently, Korean users were the ones uploading the SHC, and it’s Korean users who are targets, as well. Further analysis has shown that the threat actors are going after poorly defended Linux servers, brute-forcing their way into administrator accounts over SSH.  Mining Monero Once they make their way in, they’ll either install a cryptocurrency miner, or a DDoS IRC bot. The miner being deployed is XMRig, arguably the most popular cryptocurrency miner among hackers. It uses the computing power of a victim's endpoints to generate Monero, a privacy-oriented cryptocurrency whose transactions are seemingly impossible to track, and whose users are allegedly impossible to identify. Fo

Twitter has hidden the chronological feed on iOS again – and I'm furious

In a controversial move, Twitter has brought back a feature that removes the 'Latest Tweets' view for users on iOS, which is something that many users, including me, hated back in March 2022 – and it's now rolling out. The first time the company decided to do this, 'Home' would appear first in a tab at the top, and there was no way of changing it so that 'Latest Tweets' would be the default view. It was reverted back after the company said it was a 'bug' for iOS users. This time though, it's no bug. Instead, it's 'For You' and 'Following' where you can only swipe between them now, which doesn't make much sense for a platform where you're using the platform to keep up to date with who you follow. It's a bizarre change that makes me ask – who wants this, especially during a time when its new owner, Elon Musk, is bringing in and reversing changes almost every week still? This one change will have big consequenc