Skip to main content

Thousands of Microsoft Exchange servers are still vulnerable to this dangerous flaw

Tens of thousands of Microsoft Exchange servers are still vulnerable to a high-severity flaw used in ProxyNotShell exploits, researchers have warned.

Cybersecurity researchers Shadowserver Foundation said almost 70,000 IPs were vulnerable to CVE-2022-41082, a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability patched in early November last year.

At press time, Shadowserver’s data are showing at least 57,000 vulnerable IPs, although the information comes with a disclaimer that results were “calculated by summing counts of unique IPs, which means that a “unique” IP may have been counted more than once”. 

Mitigations and patches

“Any figures should be treated as indicative rather than exact,” Shadowserver said - however declining figures could be an indication of a positive trend. 

There are two high-severity vulnerabilities that were dubbed ProxyNotShell - the abovementioned CVE-2022-41082, and CVE-2022-41040, an elevation of privilege flaw that was also patched in early November. The affected endpoints include Exchange Server 2013, 2016, and 2019.

While there are mitigations available, researchers are urging IT pros to apply the patch instead, as the mitigations can be worked around. One report from BleepingComputer saw ransomware operators using a newly-discovered exploit chain to bypass certain ProxyNotShell mitigations and execute malicious code remotely on target devices. 

Exchange servers are valuable to hackers, and as such are often targeted. For example, the infamous LockBit group was recently caught deploying malware via compromised Exchange Servers. Last summer, two servers belonging to one company were infected with LockBit 3.0. As per the report, the attackers first deployed web shell, then escalated privileges to Active Directory admin a week later, stole some 1.3 TB of data, and encrypted systems hosted on the network.

Late last year, researchers uncovered a malicious campaign attempting to exploit the already-fixed ProxyShell vulnerability in Microsoft Exchange, too. 

Via: BleepingComputer

Source: TechRadar

Popular posts from this blog

Twitter has hidden the chronological feed on iOS again – and I'm furious

In a controversial move, Twitter has brought back a feature that removes the 'Latest Tweets' view for users on iOS, which is something that many users, including me, hated back in March 2022 – and it's now rolling out. The first time the company decided to do this, 'Home' would appear first in a tab at the top, and there was no way of changing it so that 'Latest Tweets' would be the default view. It was reverted back after the company said it was a 'bug' for iOS users. This time though, it's no bug. Instead, it's 'For You' and 'Following' where you can only swipe between them now, which doesn't make much sense for a platform where you're using the platform to keep up to date with who you follow. It's a bizarre change that makes me ask – who wants this, especially during a time when its new owner, Elon Musk, is bringing in and reversing changes almost every week still? This one change will have big consequenc

This new Linux malware floods machines with cryptominers and DDoS bots

Cybersecurity researchers have spotted a new Linux malware downloader that targets poorly defended Linux servers with cryptocurrency miners and DDoS IRC bots. Researchers from ASEC discovered the attack after the Shell Script Compiler (SHC) used to create the downloader was uploaded to VirusTotal. Apparently, Korean users were the ones uploading the SHC, and it’s Korean users who are targets, as well. Further analysis has shown that the threat actors are going after poorly defended Linux servers, brute-forcing their way into administrator accounts over SSH.  Mining Monero Once they make their way in, they’ll either install a cryptocurrency miner, or a DDoS IRC bot. The miner being deployed is XMRig, arguably the most popular cryptocurrency miner among hackers. It uses the computing power of a victim's endpoints to generate Monero, a privacy-oriented cryptocurrency whose transactions are seemingly impossible to track, and whose users are allegedly impossible to identify. Fo

Port of Lisbon hit by ransomware attack

One of Europe’s busiest seaports, the Port of Lisbon, has been hit with a ransomware attack that knocked some of its digital systems offline. "All safety protocols and response measures provided for this type of occurrence were quickly activated, the situation being monitored by the National Cybersecurity Center and the Judicial Police," a statement shared by the Port of Lisbon Administration (APL) with local media earlier this week said. The incident failed to impact the port’s operations, but did take its official website,, offline. LockBit taking responsibility "The Port of Lisbon Administration is working permanently and closely with all competent entities in order to guarantee the security of the systems and respective data," the statement concludes. While the company doesn’t explicitly say it was targeted with ransomware, the LockBit ransomware operator has added APL to its leaks website, taking responsibility for the hit.  The databas

Code-generating tools could be more of a security hindrance than help

New research by a group of Stanford-affiliated researchers has uncovered that code-generating AI tools such as Github Copilot can present more security risks than many users may realize. The study looked specifically at Codex, a product of OpenAI, of which Elon Musk is among the co-founders.  Codex powers the Microsoft-owned GitHub Copilot platform, which is designed to make coding easier and more accessible by translating natural language into code and suggesting changes based on contextual evidence. AI-coding problems Lead co-author of the study, Neil Perry, explains that “code-generating systems are currently not a replacement for human developers”. The study asked 47 developers of differing abilities to use Codex for security-related problems, using Python, JavaScript and C programming languages. It concluded that the participants who relied on Codex were more likely to write insecure code compared with a control group. Read more > These are the best laptops for progr